GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013Core: 980 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2 GB 2

3,280

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

Iris Xe Graphics G7

Shared System RAM 30

3,311

+0.9%

Arc A530M

Arc A580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 2W instead of 30W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1400% higher power demand at 30W vs 2W.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 2W instead of 30W, a 28W reduction.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1400% higher power demand at 30W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Iris Xe Graphics G7 better than GeForce GT 755M SLI?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,280 vs 3,311 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 755M SLI is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Iris Xe Graphics G7 is in basically the same MSRP band at $200 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GT 755M SLI really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GT 755M SLI make more sense than Iris Xe Graphics G7?

Yes. GeForce GT 755M SLI is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (2W vs 30W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $200 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Iris Xe Graphics G7. The trade-off is that Iris Xe Graphics G7 currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. It only holds a slight 0.9% edge in G3D-per-dollar, so the value lead is real but narrow.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 755M SLI Benchmark Check

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
1080p
low	47 FPS	80 FPS
medium	38 FPS	70 FPS
high	26 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	66 FPS
medium	27 FPS	58 FPS
high	16 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	24 FPS
medium	10 FPS	23 FPS
high	6 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce GT 755M SLI Open Iris Xe Graphics G7

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
1080p
low	96 FPS	122 FPS
medium	67 FPS	85 FPS
high	48 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	39 FPS
1440p
low	52 FPS	80 FPS
medium	31 FPS	48 FPS
high	21 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	18 FPS	38 FPS
medium	11 FPS	25 FPS
high	9 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce GT 755M SLI Open Iris Xe Graphics G7

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
1080p
low	148 FPS	149 FPS
medium	118 FPS	119 FPS
high	98 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	74 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	112 FPS
medium	89 FPS	89 FPS
high	74 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	74 FPS
medium	59 FPS	60 FPS
high	49 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce GT 755M SLI Open Iris Xe Graphics G7

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
1080p
low	141 FPS	139 FPS
medium	111 FPS	109 FPS
high	77 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	82 FPS	104 FPS
medium	60 FPS	82 FPS
high	45 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	43 FPS	63 FPS
medium	31 FPS	49 FPS
high	23 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GT 755M SLI Open Iris Xe Graphics G7

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score	3,280	3,311
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	768+700%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.1	4.6+12%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	QuickSync
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 175% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Iris Xe Graphics G7
TDP	2W-93%	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	85°C-6%
Perf/Watt	1640.0+1386%	110.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 MSRP, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers 1.2% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).