Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 755M SLI
2 GB 2
3,280
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX230
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 470M SLI
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Shared System RAM 30
3,311
+0.9%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 755M SLI is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 2W instead of 30W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1400% higher power demand at 30W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,280), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $200 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.9% (16.6 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 755M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,280
3,311
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
768+700%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 755M SLI gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 175% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7
TDP
2W-93%
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
—
Temp (Load)
90°C
85°C-6%
Perf/Watt
1640.0+1386%
110.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M SLI came in at $200, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers 1.2% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIIris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$200
$200
Performance per Dollar
16.4
16.6+1%
Codename
N14P-?
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
November 1 2013
August 15 2020
Ranking
#554
#493
Search GeForce GT 755M SLI on AmazonSearch Iris Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.