GRID P100-8Q
Iris Xe Graphics G7
GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P100-8Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID P100-8Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3587% HIGHER MSRP$7,374 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($7,374 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,174 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3636.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P100-8Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID P100-8Q
The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P100-8Q scores 3,267 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GRID P100-8Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,267 | 3,311+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+567% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P100-8Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P100-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 carries 0 MB. GRID P100-8Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P100-8Q and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | GRID P100-8Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P100-8Q draws 225W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P100-8Q) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID P100-8Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.5 | 110.4+661% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P100-8Q came in at $7374, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 was 97.3% cheaper ($7174 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers 4050% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID P100-8Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7374 | $200-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 16.6+4050% |
| Codename | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 18 2016 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #622 | #493 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P100-8Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7
