Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

Iris Xe Graphics G7
Shared System RAM 30
3,311
0.0%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A580
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2 GB 30
3,390
+2.4%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    100% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 104.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (3,390 vs 3,311), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 104.8% (33.9 vs 16.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on a 10 nm process. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,390+2%
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
10 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
96
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: QuickSync vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
QuickSync
QuickSync
Decoder
QuickSync
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 0% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
—
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
—
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85
Perf/Watt
110.4
113.0+2%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 came in at $200, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 104.2% better value.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$200
$100-50%
Performance per Dollar
16.6
33.9+104%
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
August 15 2020
August 15 2020
Ranking
#493
#508
Search Iris Xe Graphics G7 on AmazonSearch Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.