P102-100 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
P102-100
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P102-100 is positioned at rank 201 and the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is on rank 37, so the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Per Dollar UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the P102-100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | P102-100 | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Rocket Lake GT1 (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $80 for the P102-100, it costs 38% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 60.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P102-100 | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+60.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P102-100 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The P102-100 scores 3,301 and the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | P102-100 | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,301 | 3,311 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P102-100 | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P102-100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The P102-100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | P102-100 | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The P102-100 draws 250W versus the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 177.4% difference. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | P102-100 | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 15W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 220.7+1572% |
Value Analysis
The P102-100 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) launched at $50 and now averages $50. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (P102-100) vs 66.2 (UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) offers 60.3% better value. The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | P102-100 | UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $50-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $50-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3 | 66.2+60% |
| Codename | GP102 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | February 12 2018 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #560 | #432 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P102-100 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
