Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U vs Quadro K4000M
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Popular choices:
Quadro K4000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is significantly newer (2025 vs 2012). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K4000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K4000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U and Quadro K4000M
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,044 points.
Quadro K4000M
The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U scores 2,044 and the Quadro K4000M reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro K4000M uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 960 (Quadro K4000M). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 1.154 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000M).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,044 | 2,061 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+87% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+1329% | 1.154 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000M has 4 GB. The Quadro K4000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K4000M) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U draws 43W versus the Quadro K4000M's 100W — a 79.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 350W (Quadro K4000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-57% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 47.5+131% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U | Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GK104 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | June 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #229 | #676 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U and Quadro K4000M
