Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
VS
Radeon R9 M385

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U vs Radeon R9 M385

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M385

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U

#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
217%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
207%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
202%
#87
Radeon RX 7500
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
180%
#88
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
178%
#89
Moore Threads MTT S70
MSRP: $345|Avg: $140
171%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
164%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
163%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
159%
#93
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
154%
#94
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
150%
#95
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
149%
#96
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
136%
#97
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
113%
#98
Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
109%
#99
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385

#410
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1580%
#412
1433%
#413
1429%
#417
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1299%
#418
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1290%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
100%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
97%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
97%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#431
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
95%
#432
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
95%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
94%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M385 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M385 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 4700URadeon R9 M385
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M385 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 656.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 4700URadeon R9 M385
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+656.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U and Radeon R9 M385

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,044 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M385

The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U scores 2,044 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 4700URadeon R9 M385
G3D Mark Score
2,044
2,061
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792+100%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.49 TFLOPS+820%
1.792 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2300 MHz+109%
1100 MHz
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
112+100%
56
L1 Cache
512 KB+129%
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 4700URadeon R9 M385
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M385 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 4700URadeon R9 M385
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
96 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U draws 43W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 4700URadeon R9 M385
TDP
43W-43%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Perf/Watt
47.5+73%
27.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 M385 costs 86.7% less ($390 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) vs 34.4 (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon R9 M385 offers 664.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 4700URadeon R9 M385
MSRP
$450
$300-33%
Avg Price (30d)
$450
$60-87%
Performance per Dollar
4.5
34.4+664%
Codename
Navi 33
Strato
Release
August 8 2025
May 5 2015
Ranking
#229
#674