
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H vs GRID T4-1Q

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Popular choices:

GRID T4-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID T4-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID T4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $450 versus $600 for the GRID T4-1Q, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 31% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+31%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($450) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H and GRID T4-1Q

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,245 points.

GRID T4-1Q
The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H scores 3,245 and the GRID T4-1Q reaches 3,303 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GRID T4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,245 | 3,303+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+242% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+95% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H draws 43W versus the GRID T4-1Q's 225W — a 135.8% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 350W (GRID T4-1Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-81% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 75.5+414% | 14.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880 and now averages $600. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H costs 25% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 5.5 (GRID T4-1Q) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H offers 30.9% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GRID T4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-76% | $1880 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450-25% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2+31% | 5.5 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GM204 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #229 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















