
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 755M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 755M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H, it costs 89% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 809.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+809.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H and GeForce GT 755M SLI

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,245 points.

GeForce GT 755M SLI
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H scores 3,245 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI reaches 3,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GT 755M SLI uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,245 | 3,280+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H draws 43W versus the GeForce GT 755M SLI's 2W — a 182.2% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W | 2W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.5 | 1640.0+2072% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 and now averages $50. The GeForce GT 755M SLI costs 88.9% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) — the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 811.1% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $200-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $50-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 65.6+811% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | N14P-? |
| Release | August 8 2025 | November 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #229 | #554 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















