
Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U vs Radeon HD 6970M

Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6970M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6970M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6970M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6970M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U, it costs 89% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 859% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+859%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($48) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U and Radeon HD 6970M

Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,219 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon HD 6970M
The Radeon HD 6970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U scores 2,219 and the Radeon HD 6970M reaches 2,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6970M uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6970M). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970M).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,219 | 2,270+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+140% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS+509% | 1.306 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+200% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6970M) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U draws 180W versus the Radeon HD 6970M's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 12.3 | 30.3+146% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6970M costs 89.3% less ($402 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.9 (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 47.3 (Radeon HD 6970M) — the Radeon HD 6970M offers 865.3% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Radeon HD 6970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $48-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.9 | 47.3+865% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Blackcomb |
| Release | July 7 2019 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #167 | #654 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















