Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U vs Quadro K620
Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
Popular choices:
Quadro K620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K620.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U, it costs 93% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1395.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1395.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U and Quadro K620
Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,219 points. Launch price was $349.
Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U scores 2,219 and the Quadro K620 reaches 2,213 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,219 | 2,213 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS+821% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+53% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 144+500% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U draws 180W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 120% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 45W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 12.3 | 49.2+300% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The Quadro K620 costs 93.3% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.9 (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) vs 73.8 (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 offers 1406.1% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U | Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $150-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $30-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.9 | 73.8+1406% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GM107 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #167 | #660 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U and Quadro K620
