Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U vs FirePro W7000 Adapter
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 3012.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3012.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U and FirePro W7000 Adapter
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U scores 4,225 and the FirePro W7000 Adapter reaches 4,383 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is built on RDNA 2.0 while the FirePro W7000 Adapter uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,225 | 4,383+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+200% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS+565% | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+200% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter has 4 GB. The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U draws 250W versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 150W — a 50% difference. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 29.2+73% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 and now averages $15. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 96.7% less ($435 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 3008.5% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-50% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4 | 292.2+3009% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Pitcairn |
| Release | October 28 2020 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #65 | #477 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U and FirePro W7000 Adapter
