
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U vs Tesla K20Xm

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:

Tesla K20Xm
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20Xm
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K20Xm lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K20Xm is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $450 versus $7,699 for the Tesla K20Xm, it costs 94% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1541.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1541.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($450) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($7,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U and Tesla K20Xm

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.

Tesla K20Xm
The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U scores 4,225 and the Tesla K20Xm reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,225 | 4,403+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+43% | 2688 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS+311% | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+7% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+243% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20Xm has 6 GB. The Tesla K20Xm offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U draws 250W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 6.2% difference. The Tesla K20Xm is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 235W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 18.7+11% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-94% | $7699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | — |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GK110 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #65 | #473 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















