Quadro K4200 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U Performance Spectrum

Quadro K4200

4 GB 108

4,332

+2.5%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

4,225

0.0%

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Radeon RX 6650M XT

Radeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4200

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 108W instead of 250W, a 142W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

2020

Why buy it

✅77.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro K4200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌131.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 108W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 77.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K4200 instead at 4,332 vs 4,225, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U reaches 4,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 2105 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
G3D Mark Score	4,332+3%	4,225
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1344	3840+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.107 TFLOPS	16.17 TFLOPS+667%
Boost Clock	784 MHz	2105 MHz+168%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	112	240+114%
L1 Cache	112 KB	768 KB+586%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U carries 2 GB. Quadro K4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4200 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 79.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
TDP	108W-57%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	241mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	40.1+137%	16.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4200 came in at $0, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro K4200) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U (2020 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP	$0-100%	$450
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	9.4
Codename	GK104	Navi 21
Release	July 22 2014	October 28 2020
Ranking	#475	#65

Search Quadro K4200 on Amazon

Search Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.