
FirePro W8000

Quadro K4200
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro K4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro K4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro K4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 108W.
- ❌15.8% longer card at 279mm vs 241mm.
Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 225W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 279mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro K4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8000 scores 4,259 and the Quadro K4200 reaches 4,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K4200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W8000) vs 1,344 (Quadro K4200). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,259 | 4,332+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+33% | 1344 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+53% | 2.107 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+300% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W8000 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4200.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8000) vs 12_0 (Quadro K4200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8000 draws 225W versus the Quadro K4200's 108W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8000) vs 350W (Quadro K4200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 108W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 58°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9 | 40.1+112% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W8000 came in at $1599, while the Quadro K4200 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($1599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8000) vs Infinity (Quadro K4200) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4200 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | GK104 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #481 | #475 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














