Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs FirePro W8000

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012Core: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

FirePro W8000

2012Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs FirePro W8000 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W7000 Adapter
4 GB 150
4,383
+2.9%
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon R7 260
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon HD 7850
brand logoRadeon R9 295X2
brand logoRadeon RX 6600S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
FirePro W8000
4 GB 225
4,259
0.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon HD 6970
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
brand logoRadeon RX 560
brand logoRadeon RX 480
brand logoRadeon RX 6600S
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs FirePro W8000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 83% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 242mm instead of 279mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

FirePro W8000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    77.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,599 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
  • ❌15.3% longer card at 279mm vs 242mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W7000 Adapter is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (4,383 vs 4,259), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W7000 Adapter is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7000 Adapter makes the most sense to buy today. It is $700 cheaper on MSRP at $899 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 83% (4.9 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs FirePro W8000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

AMD

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 and the FirePro W8000 reaches 4,259 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterFirePro W8000
G3D Mark Score
4,383+3%
4,259
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1792+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS+33%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
112+40%
L1 Cache
320 KB
448 KB+40%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterFirePro W8000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 Adapter and 64-bit on the FirePro W8000.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterFirePro W8000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (FirePro W8000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterFirePro W8000
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterFirePro W8000
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 279mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 58°C.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterFirePro W8000
TDP
150W-33%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
279mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
58°C-36%
Perf/Watt
29.2+54%
18.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W7000 Adapter came in at $899, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599. On MSRP, FirePro W7000 Adapter was 43.8% cheaper ($700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 81.5% better value.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterFirePro W8000
MSRP
$899-44%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
4.9+81%
2.7
Codename
Pitcairn
Tahiti
Release
June 13 2012
June 14 2012
Ranking
#477
#481
Search FirePro W7000 Adapter on AmazonSearch FirePro W8000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.