
FirePro W7000 Adapter vs FirePro W8000

FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:

FirePro W8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is positioned at rank 219 and the FirePro W8000 is on rank 260, so the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W8000.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 Adapter holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $1,599), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 10870.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10870.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 Adapter and FirePro W8000

FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 and the FirePro W8000 reaches 4,259 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,383+3% | 4,259 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 448 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (FirePro W8000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 279mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 58°C.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 279mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 58°C-36% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2+54% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 99.1% less ($1584 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 10722.2% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-44% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-99% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 292.2+10722% | 2.7 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Tahiti |
| Release | June 13 2012 | June 14 2012 |
| Ranking | #477 | #481 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















