FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon R7 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
503.4% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 30.1 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Radeon R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 517% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 221mm instead of 242mm, a 21mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (4,482 vs 4,383), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W7000 Adapter is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $750 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 517% (30.1 vs 4.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W7000 Adapter has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon R7 370

The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 and the Radeon R7 370 reaches 4,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 370). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,383	4,482+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS+22%	1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon R7 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 Adapter has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 370 carries 2 GB. FirePro W7000 Adapter gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 Adapter and 256-bit on the Radeon R7 370.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon R7 370
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (Radeon R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon R7 370
DirectX	12	12
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 370).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon R7 370
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 370's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 450W (Radeon R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon R7 370
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	242mm	221mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.2	44.8+53%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W7000 Adapter came in at $899, while the Radeon R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 370 was 83.4% cheaper ($750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 30.1 (Radeon R7 370) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 514.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 370 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon R7 370
MSRP	$899	$149-83%
Performance per Dollar	4.9	30.1+514%
Codename	Pitcairn	Trinidad
Release	June 13 2012	June 18 2015
Ranking	#477	#467

Search FirePro W7000 Adapter on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.