
FirePro W7000

FirePro W7000 Adapter
FirePro W7000 vs FirePro W7000 Adapter Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7000 vs FirePro W7000 Adapter FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W7000 vs FirePro W7000 Adapter: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
FirePro W7000 Adapter
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7000 vs FirePro W7000 Adapter Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7000
The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 and the FirePro W7000 Adapter reaches 4,383 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W7000 Adapter uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,304 | 4,383+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 and 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 Adapter.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000) vs 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Decoder: UVD vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 28.7 | 29.2+2% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7000 came in at $899, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 4.9 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 2.1% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 4.9+2% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Pitcairn |
| Release | June 13 2012 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #477 | #477 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














