
FirePro W7000

Tesla K20Xm
FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20Xm Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20Xm FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20Xm: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,800 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 737.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 235W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla K20Xm
2012Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌756.4% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ❌56.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20Xm Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7000
The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

Tesla K20Xm
The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 and the Tesla K20Xm reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,304 | 4,403+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2688+110% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 3.935 TFLOPS+62% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 224+180% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+43% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20Xm carries 6 GB. Tesla K20Xm gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20Xm. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the Tesla K20Xm has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 44.2% difference. The FirePro W7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-36% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.7+53% | 18.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7000 came in at $899, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. On MSRP, FirePro W7000 was 88.3% cheaper ($6800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 0.6 (Tesla K20Xm) — the FirePro W7000 offers 700% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-88% | $7699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8+700% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK110 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #477 | #473 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














