
FirePro W7000
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W7000 is positioned at rank #223 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $149), it costs 66% less, resulting in a 201.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+201.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

FirePro W7000
The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,304+1% | 4,260 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 2.496 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 384 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has 2 GB. The FirePro W7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 220mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 110W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 220mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 70-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.7 | 38.7+35% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The FirePro W7000 costs 66.4% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.1 (FirePro W7000) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the FirePro W7000 offers 201% better value. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $149-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-66% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.1+201% | 28.6 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Trinidad |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #477 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















