G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W7000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7000

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
503.4% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
❌10% longer card at 242mm vs 220mm.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 497.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 220mm instead of 242mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W7000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (4,304 vs 4,260), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $750 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 497.2% (28.6 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W7000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W7000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7000

The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

Feature	FirePro W7000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,304+1%	4,260
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L1 Cache	320 KB	384 KB+20%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 carries 2 GB. FirePro W7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370.

Feature	FirePro W7000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro W7000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

Feature	FirePro W7000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 220mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70.

Feature	FirePro W7000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	150W	110W-27%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	242mm	220mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	90°C	70-22%
Perf/Watt	28.7	38.7+35%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W7000 came in at $899, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 was 83.4% cheaper ($750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 495.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W7000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP	$899	$149-83%
Performance per Dollar	4.8	28.6+496%
Codename	Pitcairn	Trinidad
Release	June 13 2012	May 5 2015
Ranking	#477	#456

Search FirePro W7000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.