
FirePro W7000

GRID V100D-8Q
FirePro W7000 vs GRID V100D-8Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7000 vs GRID V100D-8Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W7000 vs GRID V100D-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,101 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1052% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID V100D-8Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1012.3% HIGHER MSRP$10,000 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7000 vs GRID V100D-8Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7000
The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 and the GRID V100D-8Q reaches 4,156 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,304+4% | 4,156 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+45% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100D-8Q carries 2 GB. FirePro W7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 and 64-bit on the GRID V100D-8Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000) vs 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.7+55% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7000 came in at $899, while the GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000. On MSRP, FirePro W7000 was 91% cheaper ($9101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) — the FirePro W7000 offers 1100% better value. The newer card here is GRID V100D-8Q (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-91% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8+1100% | 0.4 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM107 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #477 | #622 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














