Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20c

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

2012Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20c Performance Spectrum

FirePro W7000
4 GB 150
4,304
0.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon HD 6970
brand logoRadeon RX 560X
brand logoRadeon 840M
brand logoRadeon R9 295X2
brand logoRadeon RX 6600S
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
Tesla K20c
2 GB 225
4,432
+3.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
brand logoGeForce GTX 570
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 245.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K20c

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    255.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,199 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla K20c is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (4,432 vs 4,304), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,300 cheaper on MSRP at $899 vs $3,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 245.6% (4.8 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K20c still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W7000

The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7000 scores 4,304 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).

FeatureFirePro W7000Tesla K20c
G3D Mark Score
4,304
4,432+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2496+95%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS+45%
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
80
208+160%
L1 Cache
320 KB+54%
208 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.25 MB+150%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7000Tesla K20c
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20c carries 2 GB. FirePro W7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20c. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7000Tesla K20c
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.25 MB+150%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro W7000Tesla K20c
DirectX
12+9%
11_0
Max Displays
6
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 draws 150W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W7000Tesla K20c
TDP
150W-33%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
—
Perf/Watt
28.7+46%
19.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W7000 came in at $899, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. On MSRP, FirePro W7000 was 71.9% cheaper ($2300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (FirePro W7000) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the FirePro W7000 offers 242.9% better value.

FeatureFirePro W7000Tesla K20c
MSRP
$899-72%
$3199
Performance per Dollar
4.8+243%
1.4
Codename
Pitcairn
GK110
Release
June 13 2012
November 12 2012
Ranking
#477
#549
Search FirePro W7000 on AmazonSearch Tesla K20c on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.