
FirePro W7000 Adapter vs GRID P6-4Q

FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:

GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is positioned at rank 219 and the GRID P6-4Q is on rank 280, so the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 Adapter holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 889.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+889.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 Adapter and GRID P6-4Q

FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 and the GRID P6-4Q reaches 4,429 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,383 | 4,429+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+10% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 576 KB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 Adapter comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-4Q has 2 GB. The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 40% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 44.3+52% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 890.5% better value. The GRID P6-4Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-55% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 292.2+891% | 29.5 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM204 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #477 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













