FirePro W7000 Adapter
VS
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012Core: 950 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is positioned at rank #219 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter

#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
91%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
89%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
86%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
86%
#204
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
3027%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
100%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#223
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
98%
#224
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
98%
#226
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
93%
#227
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
93%
#231
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370.

InsightFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 Adapter holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $149), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 922% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+922%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 Adapter and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

AMD

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score
4,383+3%
4,260
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
320 KB
384 KB+20%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 Adapter comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has 2 GB. The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 220mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70.

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP
150W
110W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
242mm
220mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
70-22%
Perf/Watt
29.2
38.7+33%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 89.9% less ($134 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 921.7% better value. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W7000 AdapterRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP
$899
$149-83%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-90%
$149
Performance per Dollar
292.2+922%
28.6
Codename
Pitcairn
Trinidad
Release
June 13 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#477
#456