
FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is positioned at rank #219 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 Adapter and GeForce GTX 660 Ti

FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti reaches 4,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,383 | 4,415 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1344+5% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 2.634 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+186% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7000 Adapter comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB. The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 660 Ti's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 97°C.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C-7% | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 29.4 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 0.7% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W7000 Adapter | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $299-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 292.2 | 294.3 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | August 16 2012 |
| Ranking | #477 | #472 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












