FirePro W8000 vs GRID P6-4Q

FirePro W8000

2012Core: 900 MHz
VS

GRID P6-4Q

2015Core: 722 MHz

FirePro W8000 vs GRID P6-4Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W8000 vs GRID P6-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W8000

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $401 less on MSRP ($1,599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
  • 27800% longer card at 279mm vs 1mm.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 279mm, a 278mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 25.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$1,599 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P6-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4% in PassMark G3D (4,429 vs 4,259), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W8000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $401 cheaper on MSRP at $1,599 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 20.3% (2.7 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P6-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W8000 vs GRID P6-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

NVIDIA

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8000 scores 4,259 and the GRID P6-4Q reaches 4,429 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W8000) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).

FeatureFirePro W8000GRID P6-4Q
G3D Mark Score
4,259
4,429+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792+17%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+45%
2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
112+17%
96
L1 Cache
448 KB
576 KB+29%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W8000GRID P6-4Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-4Q carries 2 GB. FirePro W8000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W8000 and 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W8000) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W8000GRID P6-4Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8000) vs 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro W8000GRID P6-4Q
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
6
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8000 draws 225W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8000) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro W8000GRID P6-4Q
TDP
225W
100W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
279mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
58°C
Perf/Watt
18.9
44.3+134%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W8000 came in at $1599, while the GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, FirePro W8000 was 20.1% cheaper ($401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8000) vs 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) — the FirePro W8000 offers 22.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-4Q (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W8000GRID P6-4Q
MSRP
$1599-20%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
2.7+23%
2.2
Codename
Tahiti
GM204
Release
June 14 2012
August 30 2015
Ranking
#481
#535

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.