
FirePro W8000

Quadro M2200
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M2200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M2200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌219.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌309.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 55W.
Quadro M2200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 222.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 225W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M2200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8000 scores 4,259 and the Quadro M2200 reaches 4,294 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W8000) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,259 | 4,294 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+75% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+52% | 2.122 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+17% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W8000 and 64-bit on the Quadro M2200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W8000) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs 2nd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | 2nd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8000 draws 225W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 121.4% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8000) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 58°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 55W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 58°C-28% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9 | 78.1+313% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W8000 came in at $1599, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro M2200 was 68.7% cheaper ($1099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8000) vs 8.6 (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 offers 218.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $500-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 8.6+219% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GM206 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #481 | #479 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














