
FirePro W8000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

FirePro W8000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W8000 is positioned at rank #260 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W8000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $1,599), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 10950.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10950.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8000 and GeForce GTX 660 Ti

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8000 scores 4,259 and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti reaches 4,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W8000) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,259 | 4,415+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+33% | 1344 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+22% | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+300% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB. The FirePro W8000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W8000) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the FirePro W8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8000) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 660 Ti's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8000) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 58°C vs 97°C.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 58°C-40% | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9 | 29.4+56% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 MSRP and currently averages $1599, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 and now averages $15. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti costs 99.1% less ($1584 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (FirePro W8000) vs 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 10800% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W8000 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $299-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1599 | $15-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 294.3+10800% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GK104 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | August 16 2012 |
| Ranking | #481 | #472 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















