FirePro W8000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

FirePro W8000

2012Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W8000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W8000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W8000

2012

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 434.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,599 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
  • 15.8% longer card at 279mm vs 241mm.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 454.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 279mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (4,415 vs 4,259), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W8000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,300 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 454.4% (14.8 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W8000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W8000 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8000 scores 4,259 and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti reaches 4,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W8000) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti).

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 660 Ti
G3D Mark Score
4,259
4,415+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792+33%
1344
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+22%
2.634 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+33%
24
TMUs
112
112
L1 Cache
448 KB+300%
112 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+33%
384 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W8000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti carries 3 GB. FirePro W8000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W8000 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W8000) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the FirePro W8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 660 Ti
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
512 KB+33%
384 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8000) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 660 Ti
DirectX
12
12 (FL 11_0)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+7%
4.3
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti).

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 1st gen
Decoder
UVD 3.2
PureVideo VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 660 Ti's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8000) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 58°C vs 97°C.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 660 Ti
TDP
225W
150W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
279mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
58°C-40%
97°C
Perf/Watt
18.9
29.4+56%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W8000 came in at $1599, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 660 Ti was 81.3% cheaper ($1300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8000) vs 14.8 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 448.1% better value.

FeatureFirePro W8000GeForce GTX 660 Ti
MSRP
$1599
$299-81%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
14.8+448%
Codename
Tahiti
GK104
Release
June 14 2012
August 16 2012
Ranking
#481
#472

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.