Quadro K4200 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4200

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅3.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Measures 220mm instead of 241mm, a 21mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K4200 instead at 4,332 vs 4,260, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K4200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,332+2%	4,260
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344+5%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.107 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+18%
Boost Clock	784 MHz	975 MHz+24%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+40%	80
L1 Cache	112 KB	384 KB+243%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 carries 2 GB. Quadro K4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4200 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K4200) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX	12_0	12 (11_1)
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.0.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 4.0
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 1.8% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 220mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	108W-2%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	241mm	220mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	40.1+4%	38.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4200 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro K4200) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP	$0-100%	$149
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	28.6
Codename	GK104	Trinidad
Release	July 22 2014	May 5 2015
Ranking	#475	#456

Search Quadro K4200 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.