CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Quadro K4200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is positioned at rank #13 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2025 vs 2014). The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K4200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K4200.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3% better value per dollar than the Quadro K4200.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Quadro K4200
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.
Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the Quadro K4200 reaches 4,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro K4200 uses Kepler, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 1,344 (Quadro K4200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,463+3% | 4,332 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+167% | 1344 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 12_0 (Quadro K4200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Quadro K4200's 108W — a 73.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 350W (Quadro K4200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-54% | 108W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 89.3+123% | 40.1 |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 86.6 (Quadro K4200) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 3.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.3+3% | 86.6 |
| Codename | GN22-X2 | GK104 |
| Release | January 2 2025 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #475 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Quadro K4200
