
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs Quadro P1000

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is positioned at rank #13 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $80 for the Quadro P1000, it costs 38% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 58.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Quadro P1000

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 640 (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,463 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+460% | 640 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 40W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 89.3 | 112.4+26% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 58.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-38% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.3+59% | 56.2 |
| Codename | GN22-X2 | GP107 |
| Release | January 2 2025 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















