
Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

Arc A350M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc A350M is positioned at rank 86 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is on rank 13, so the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile).
| Insight | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A350M and GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) reaches 4,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,463 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3584+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Media Engine | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | Intel Media Engine | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+102% | 89.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GN22-X2 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #418 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















