Arc A350M vs Quadro P1000

Arc A350M vs Quadro P1000 Performance Spectrum

Arc A350M

4 GB 25

4,500

+0.1%

4,495

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs Quadro P1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs Quadro P1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

✅14.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 40W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro P1000

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A350M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌60% higher power demand at 40W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A350M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (4,500 vs 4,495), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A350M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A350M vs Quadro P1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1519 MHz.

Feature	Arc A350M	Quadro P1000
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,495
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.766 TFLOPS+14%	1.555 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1519 MHz+32%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+479%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A350M	Quadro P1000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 64-bit on the Quadro P1000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A350M	Quadro P1000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A350M	Quadro P1000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).

Feature	Arc A350M	Quadro P1000
Encoder	Intel Media Engine	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	Intel Media Engine	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc A350M	Quadro P1000
TDP	25W-38%	40W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	180.0+60%	112.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2017).

Feature	Arc A350M	Quadro P1000
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	DG2-128	GP107
Release	March 30 2022	February 7 2017
Ranking	#418	#466

Search Arc A350M on Amazon

Search Quadro P1000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.