Arc A350M vs Quadro P1000
Arc A350M
Popular choices:
Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A350M is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A350M uses modern memory architecture. The Arc A350M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P1000.
| Insight | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A350M and Quadro P1000
Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.766 TFLOPS+14% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1519 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+479% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Media Engine | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Intel Media Engine | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-38% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+60% | 112.4 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A350M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc A350M | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $80 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GP107 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #418 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A350M and Quadro P1000
