Arc A350M vs GeForce MX550

Intel

Arc A350M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce MX550

2021Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1320 MHz
Similar parts
·

Arc A350M vs GeForce MX550 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs GeForce MX550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs GeForce MX550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce MX550 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

GeForce MX550

2021

Why buy it

  • 3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX550 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A350M instead at 4,500 vs 4,480, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A350M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A350M vs GeForce MX550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX550

The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1320 MHz.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce MX550
G3D Mark Score
4,500
4,480
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768
1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.766 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1320 MHz+15%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
1.1 MB
2 MB+82%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX550 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce MX550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX550 carries 2 GB. Arc A350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A350M) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce MX550) — a 40% advantage for the Arc A350M. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 64-bit on the GeForce MX550. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX550) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce MX550
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s+40%
80 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 0% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureArc A350MGeForce MX550
TDP
25W
25W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
180.0
179.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureArc A350MGeForce MX550
MSRP
$150
Codename
DG2-128
TU117S
Release
March 30 2022
December 17 2021
Ranking
#418
#468

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.