Arc A350M vs Radeon Sky 500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Sky 500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Sky 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Sky 500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Sky 500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5% in PassMark G3D (4,723 vs 4,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Sky 500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Sky 500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A350M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Sky 500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Radeon Sky 500

The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A350M scores 4,500 versus the Radeon Sky 500's 4,723 — the Radeon Sky 500 leads by 5%. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Sky 500
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,723+5%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 1.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.766 TFLOPS	2.432 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+255%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Sky 500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Sky 500 carries 2 GB. Arc A350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 64-bit on the Radeon Sky 500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Sky 500
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 142.9% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Sky 500
TDP	25W-83%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	180.0+471%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Sky 500
MSRP	—	$500
Codename	DG2-128	Pitcairn
Release	March 30 2022	March 27 2013
Ranking	#418	#455

Search Arc A350M on Amazon

Search Radeon Sky 500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.