CPU
GPU
Arc A350M
Popular choices:
GRID RTX6000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A350M is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A350M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Arc A350M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID RTX6000-8Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A350M and GRID RTX6000-8Q
Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the GRID RTX6000-8Q reaches 4,514 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GRID RTX6000-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,514 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.766 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+173% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1178 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+47% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A350M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-8Q has 2 GB. The Arc A350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Media Engine | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | Intel Media Engine | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the GRID RTX6000-8Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+796% | 20.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A350M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A350M | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $500 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GM204 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #418 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A350M and GRID RTX6000-8Q
