Arc A350M vs Radeon R9 370

Intel

Arc A350M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A350M vs Radeon R9 370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs Radeon R9 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 25W instead of 110W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

  • 15.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 340% higher power demand at 110W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.9% in PassMark G3D (4,722 vs 4,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A350M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A350M vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureArc A350MRadeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score
4,500
4,722+5%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GCN 1.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.766 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+41%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+18%
975 MHz
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
48
80+67%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+189%
0.38 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A350MRadeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A350M) vs 179 GB/s (Radeon R9 370) — a 59.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 370. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A350MRadeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
179 GB/s+60%
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureArc A350MRadeon R9 370
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

FeatureArc A350MRadeon R9 370
Encoder
Intel Media Engine
VCE 1.0
Decoder
Intel Media Engine
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 125.9% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.

FeatureArc A350MRadeon R9 370
TDP
25W-77%
110W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
221mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
75-6%
Perf/Watt
180.0+320%
42.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureArc A350MRadeon R9 370
MSRP
$149
Codename
DG2-128
Trinidad
Release
March 30 2022
May 5 2015
Ranking
#418
#456

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.