Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Intel

Arc A350M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

  • 21.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A350M instead at 4,500 vs 4,498, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A350M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

FeatureArc A350MRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score
4,500
4,498
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GCN 4.0
Process Node
6 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.766 TFLOPS
2.588 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+14%
1011 MHz
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
48
80+67%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+255%
0.31 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A350MRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. Arc A350M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A350MRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 88.9% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureArc A350MRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
TDP
25W-62%
65W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
180.0+160%
69.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2018).

FeatureArc A350MRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
MSRP
$0
Codename
DG2-128
Polaris 22
Release
March 30 2022
April 24 2018
Ranking
#418
#464

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.