Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A350M is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

98%

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#75

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

239%

#77

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

217%

#78

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

216%

#82

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

196%

#83

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

195%

#85

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

100%

#86

Arc A350M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#91

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

97%

#94

GeForce GT 555M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

95%

#96

GeForce GTX 760M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

95%

#99

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc A350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.

Insight	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%)
Longevity	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A350M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A350M and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,498
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.766 TFLOPS	2.588 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+14%	1011 MHz
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+255%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A350M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The Arc A350M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 88.9% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.