Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro 465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro 465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro 465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

✅0.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (4,538 vs 4,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 465 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 465 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A350M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro 465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 907 MHz.

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro 465
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,538
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.766 TFLOPS	1.858 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+27%	907 MHz
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	48	64+33%
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+340%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro 465
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 465 carries 2 GB. Arc A350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro 465
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 33.3% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro 465
TDP	25W-29%	35W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	180.0+39%	129.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	Arc A350M	Radeon Pro 465
MSRP	—	$500
Codename	DG2-128	Baffin
Release	March 30 2022	October 30 2016
Ranking	#418	#547

Search Arc A350M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.