Arc A350M vs Arc Graphics 130V

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc A350M is positioned at rank 86 and the Arc Graphics 130V is on rank 302, so the Arc A350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

98%

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#75

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

239%

#77

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

217%

#78

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

216%

#82

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

196%

#83

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

195%

#85

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

100%

#86

Arc A350M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#91

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

97%

#94

GeForce GT 555M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

95%

#96

GeForce GTX 760M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

95%

#99

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

100%

#292

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

722%

#294

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

655%

#295

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

653%

#299

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

594%

#300

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

590%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

100%

#305

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

99%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

98%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

98%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

95%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

94%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc A350M	Arc Graphics 130V
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)	Xe² (2024) (3nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 130V remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A350M Benchmark Check

Arc Graphics 130V Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A350M and Arc Graphics 130V

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Arc Graphics 130V

The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Arc Graphics 130V reaches 4,510 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe², both on 6 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1850 MHz.

Feature	Arc A350M	Arc Graphics 130V
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,510
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Xe²
Process Node	6 nm	3 nm
Shading Units	768+10871%	7
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1850 MHz+61%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A350M	Arc Graphics 130V
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A350M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB. The Arc A350M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Arc A350M	Arc Graphics 130V
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A350M	Arc Graphics 130V
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V).

Feature	Arc A350M	Arc Graphics 130V
Encoder	Intel Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	Intel Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 50% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.