
Arc A350M

Radeon R7 370
Arc A350M vs Radeon R7 370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A350M vs Radeon R7 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A350M vs Radeon R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A350M
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Radeon R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅9.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A350M vs Radeon R7 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the Radeon R7 370 reaches 4,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 370). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,482 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.766 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+18% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+340% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A350M | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A350M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 370 carries 2 GB. Arc A350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A350M) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R7 370) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon R7 370. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 256-bit on the Radeon R7 370. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s+60% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 (Radeon R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 370).
| Feature | Arc A350M | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Media Engine | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Media Engine | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the Radeon R7 370's 100W — a 120% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 450W (Radeon R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Arc A350M | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-75% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 221mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+302% | 44.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A350M | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | Trinidad |
| Release | March 30 2022 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #418 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















