Arc A350M vs FirePro S7000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A350M vs FirePro S7000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A350M vs FirePro S7000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A350M

2022

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro S7000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (4,524 vs 4,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro S7000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro S7000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A350M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A350M vs FirePro S7000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A350M

The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A350M scores 4,500 and the FirePro S7000 reaches 4,524 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A350M is built on Generation 12.7 while the FirePro S7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A350M) vs 1,280 (FirePro S7000). Raw compute: 1.766 TFLOPS (Arc A350M) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000).

Feature	Arc A350M	FirePro S7000
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,524
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 1.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.766 TFLOPS	2.432 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+255%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A350M	FirePro S7000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A350M and 64-bit on the FirePro S7000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A350M) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) — the Arc A350M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A350M	FirePro S7000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M) vs 12 (11_1) (FirePro S7000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Arc A350M	FirePro S7000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S7000). Decoder: Intel Media Engine vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M) vs H.264 (FirePro S7000).

Feature	Arc A350M	FirePro S7000
Encoder	Intel Media Engine	VCE 1.0
Decoder	Intel Media Engine	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A350M draws 25W versus the FirePro S7000's 150W — a 142.9% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A350M) vs 350W (FirePro S7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 292mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85.

Feature	Arc A350M	FirePro S7000
TDP	25W-83%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	292mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80-6%	85
Perf/Watt	180.0+496%	30.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A350M (2022 vs 2012).

Feature	Arc A350M	FirePro S7000
MSRP	—	$1249
Codename	DG2-128	Pitcairn
Release	March 30 2022	August 27 2012
Ranking	#418	#462

Search Arc A350M on Amazon

Search FirePro S7000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.