CPU
GPU
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank 330 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is on rank 13, so the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 495.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+495.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) reaches 4,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,463 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Shading Units | 8 | 3584+44700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+44% | 89.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 495.3% better value.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $50-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 89.3+495% |
| Codename | — | GN22-X2 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #409 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
