Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce MX550
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
GeForce MX550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank 330 and the GeForce MX550 is on rank 187, so the GeForce MX550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX550 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 99.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce MX550
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1320 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,480 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Turing |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1024+12700% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+78% | 1320 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX550 has 2 GB. The GeForce MX550 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX550) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 25W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6 | 179.2+39% |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce MX550 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce MX550 costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 29.9 (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 offers 99.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $150-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 29.9+99% |
| Codename | — | TU117S |
| Release | January 6 2025 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #409 | #468 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce MX550
