
Arc Graphics 140T

Radeon R7 370
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R7 370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R7 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R7 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌134.9% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 30.1 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Radeon R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 134% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R7 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Radeon R7 370 reaches 4,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon R7 370 uses GCN 1.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 370). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,482 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | GCN 1.0 |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1024+12700% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+141% | 975 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 370 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 370 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 256-bit on the Radeon R7 370. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 179.2 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (Radeon R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 370).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 370's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 450W (Radeon R7 370). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-65% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 221mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+187% | 44.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Radeon R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 370 was 57.4% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 30.1 (Radeon R7 370) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 133.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $149-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 30.1+133% |
| Codename | — | Trinidad |
| Release | January 6 2025 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #409 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















