Arc Graphics 140T
VS
Radeon R7 370

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R7 370

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 370

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T

#320
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
844%
#322
765%
#323
763%
#327
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
694%
#328
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
689%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
100%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
99%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
99%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
96%
#336
95%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
94%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
93%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity
Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $51 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 485.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+485.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($51)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and Radeon R7 370

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 370

The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Radeon R7 370 reaches 4,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon R7 370 uses GCN 1.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 370). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
G3D Mark Score
4,500
4,482
Architecture
Xe+
GCN 1.0
Shading Units
8
1024+12700%
Boost Clock
2350 MHz+141%
975 MHz
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 370 has 2 GB. The Radeon R7 370 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
VRAM Capacity
Shared
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
179.2 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (Radeon R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 370).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 2.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 370's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 450W (Radeon R7 370). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
TDP
35W-65%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
221mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
128.6+187%
44.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $51. The Radeon R7 370 costs 83% less ($249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 486% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R7 370
MSRP
$350
$149-57%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$51-83%
Performance per Dollar
15.0
87.9+486%
Codename
Trinidad
Release
January 6 2025
June 18 2015
Ranking
#409
#467