Arc Graphics 140T
Quadro P1000
Arc Graphics 140T vs Quadro P1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140T vs Quadro P1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140T vs Quadro P1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro P1000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quadro P1000
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140T vs Quadro P1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Pascal |
| Shading Units | 8 | 640+7900% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+55% | 1519 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 carries 4 GB. Quadro P1000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 64-bit on the Quadro P1000. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 13.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-13% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+14% | 112.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro P1000 was 100+% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs Infinity (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | — | GP107 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #409 | #466 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and Quadro P1000
