Arc Graphics 140T vs Quadro P1000

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz

Quadro P1000

2017Core: 1493 MHzBoost: 1519 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc Graphics 140T

4,500

+0.1%

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

4,495

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T

#320

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

844%

#322

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

765%

#323

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

763%

#327

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

694%

#328

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

689%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

100%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

99%

#333

GeForce 730A

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

99%

#334

GeForce GT 745A

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#335

GeForce 710A

MSRP: $35|Avg: $62

96%

#336

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

95%

#338

GeForce MX230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

94%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

94%

#342

Radeon R7 M465X

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

93%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity	Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 274.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+274.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)	✅More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc Graphics 140T Benchmark Check

Quadro P1000 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and Quadro P1000

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1519 MHz.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,495
Architecture	Xe+	Pascal
Shading Units	8	640+7900%
Boost Clock	2350 MHz+55%	1519 MHz
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
VRAM Capacity	Shared	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 13.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Quadro P1000
TDP	35W-13%	40W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	128.6+14%	112.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The Quadro P1000 costs 73.3% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 offers 274.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).