Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 Nano

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 Nano FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140T

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 81% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Radeon R9 Nano is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 35W instead of 175W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
85.4% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 175W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 Nano is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (4,609 vs 4,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc Graphics 140T is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc Graphics 140T makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 81% (12.9 vs 7.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Nano still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,609+2%
Architecture	Xe+	GCN 3.0
Shading Units	8	4096+51100%
Boost Clock	2350 MHz+135%	1000 MHz
L2 Cache	8 MB+300%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 Nano gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	Shared	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	System	512 GB/s
Bus Width	System	4096-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon R9 Nano
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon R9 Nano
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 3.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 152mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	35W-80%	175W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 8-pin
Length	0mm	152mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	128.6+389%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140T was 46.1% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Arc Graphics 140T offers 81.7% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2015).

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon R9 Nano
MSRP	$350-46%	$649
Performance per Dollar	12.9+82%	7.1
Codename	—	Fiji
Release	January 6 2025	August 27 2015
Ranking	#409	#306

Search Arc Graphics 140T on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 Nano on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.