Arc Graphics 140T vs Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank 330 and the Arc Graphics 130V is on rank 302, so the Arc Graphics 130V offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc Graphics 130V offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 20.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Arc Graphics 130V reaches 4,510 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe². Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1850 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,510 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Xe² |
| Shading Units | 8+14% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+27% | 1850 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6 | 300.7+134% |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Arc Graphics 130V costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) — the Arc Graphics 130V offers 20% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $300-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $250-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 18.0+20% |
| Codename | — | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | January 6 2025 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #409 | #463 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and Arc Graphics 130V
