Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140T

2025

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc Graphics 140T is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0% in PassMark G3D (4,500 vs 4,498), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc Graphics 140T is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc Graphics 140T makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	4,500	4,498
Architecture	Xe+	GCN 4.0
Shading Units	8	1280+15900%
Boost Clock	2350 MHz+132%	1011 MHz
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	Shared	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 60% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
TDP	35W-46%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	128.6+86%	69.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL was 100+% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2018).

Feature	Arc Graphics 140T	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
MSRP	$350	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	12.9	Infinity
Codename	—	Polaris 22
Release	January 6 2025	April 24 2018
Ranking	#409	#464

Search Arc Graphics 140T on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.