Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 370

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 370 Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 140T
Shared 35
4,500
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc A550M
brand logoArc A770
Radeon R9 370
4 GB 110
4,722
+4.9%
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon R7 360
brand logoRadeon RX 560
brand logoRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 5500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6850M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140T

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Radeon R9 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    134.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $350 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 146.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.9% in PassMark G3D (4,722 vs 4,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140T is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 146.5% (31.7 vs 12.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Arc Graphics 140T has the stronger long-term case.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score
4,500
4,722+5%
Architecture
Xe+
GCN 1.0
Shading Units
8
1280+15900%
Boost Clock
2350 MHz+141%
975 MHz
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 370 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
179 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R9 370
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R9 370
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 1.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 103.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R9 370
TDP
35W-68%
110W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
221mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
128.6+200%
42.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 370 was 57.4% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 145.7% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TRadeon R9 370
MSRP
$350
$149-57%
Performance per Dollar
12.9
31.7+146%
Codename
—
Trinidad
Release
January 6 2025
May 5 2015
Ranking
#409
#456
Search Arc Graphics 140T on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.