Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K40c

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

2013Core: 745 MHzBoost: 876 MHz
Similar parts
·

Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K40c Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140T

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $7,349 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2102.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
  • Tesla K40c is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 35W instead of 245W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2099.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,699 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 600% higher power demand at 245W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 140T is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (4,500 vs 4,495), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140T is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140T makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,349 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $7,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2102.2% (12.9 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 876 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TTesla K40c
G3D Mark Score
4,500
4,495
Architecture
Xe+
Kepler
Shading Units
8
2880+35900%
Boost Clock
2350 MHz+168%
876 MHz
L2 Cache
8 MB+433%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140TTesla K40c
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c carries 2 GB. Tesla K40c gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TTesla K40c
VRAM Capacity
Shared
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+433%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TTesla K40c
DirectX
12.2+11%
11_0
Max Displays
3
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 150% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TTesla K40c
TDP
35W-86%
245W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
128.6+603%
18.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140T was 95.5% cheaper ($7349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the Arc Graphics 140T offers 2050% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TTesla K40c
MSRP
$350-95%
$7699
Performance per Dollar
12.9+2050%
0.6
Codename
GK180
Release
January 6 2025
October 8 2013
Ranking
#409
#465

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.