Arc Graphics 140T vs Tesla K40c
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Tesla K40c
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank 330 and the Tesla K40c is on rank 378, so the Arc Graphics 140T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40c
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K40c lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla K40c offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc Graphics 140T offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $500 for the Tesla K40c, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 66.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+66.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and Tesla K40c
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Kepler |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2880+35900% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+168% | 876 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c has 2 GB. The Tesla K40c offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+11% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 150% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-86% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+603% | 18.3 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699 and now averages $500. The Arc Graphics 140T costs 40% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 9.0 (Tesla K40c) — the Arc Graphics 140T offers 66.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-95% | $7699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-40% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0+67% | 9.0 |
| Codename | — | GK180 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #409 | #465 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and Tesla K40c
